Call it the Caudillo Test: It’s no longer enough for a Democratic presidential candidate to pledge to reform immigration laws. You have to pledge to end-run the nation’s elected legislature if it doesn’t go along. Good to know! … P.S.: Hillary appears to have passed the Caudillo Test. Luckily, there is nobody general election voters trust more with unchecked power. Am I right? … P.P.S.: Immigration activists now want Hillary to talk about amnesty as “part of her stump speech” to non-Latino audiences. In early 2015, or late 2016? I wouldn’t bet on the latter. …
Update: Hillary’s talk makes it clear, if more clarity were needed, that the “non-citizenship” halfway house favored by Republican politicians is a non-starter — at least if the goal is to woo the Latino vote. Democrats will always be able to outbid Republicans, as Hillary did, by calling non-citizenship “second-class status” (which it is). Arguably, the “non-citizenship” position is worse, in that respect, for Republicans. It’s one thing to tell illegals “You’re illegal, sorry.” But if you tell them they can have legal status and live here — well, what’t the basis for denying them full rights? Because they’re brown? The implicit charge of racism, never far from the surface, becomes more plausible, not less. … Of course, if Jeb Bush or Ted Cruz ever makes it past the GOP primaries, they’ll quickly drop the non-citizenship demand (as Jeb already has, once). It’s an untenable positioner’s position. …
Hillary passes the Caudillo Test! http://t.co/JzFuGxORqR
The non-citizenship amnesty is “untenable positioner’s position.” Maybe *worse* w/ Hisp voters than no amnesty at all http://t.co/p0t2krZphj
Republicans will never be able to outbid Dems on immigration @kausmickey points out, +look bad by even trying. http://t.co/Ruj77ZpXdv
How about Republicans take it a step further than Hillary and REQUIRE that illegal aliens who receive green cards MUST be naturalized within a period of time, say, 13 years, or they will lose those green cards? In fact, how about requiring that of ALL green card holders?
[…] MICKEY KAUS: Call it the Caudillo Test: It’s no longer enough for a Democratic presidential candidate to pl… […]
Analyze this from the perspective of HRC. She somehow thinks there’s fertile political ground from Hispanic voters to harvest in the differential between amnesty-with-citizenship and the “usual mehe” of just legal status + work permit. When in reality there isn’t; all the illegals want is legal status + work permit. She’ll probably get statistically no new Hispanic votes by going full monty. But her radicalism, being to the left of even Obama, will turn her off among white voters and some other voters.
Mickey Kaus http://t.co/eRisiVx1dX
I don’t see the point of this hyperbolic rhetoric. Mickey Kaus is going to vote for Hillary Clinton: does he really expect us to believe that he is voting to turn the U.S. into a banana republic?
I personally am not going to vote for Hillary, but that doesn’t make her a threat to the republic, as Kaus would have it. She’s just a misguided Democrat (not unlike Kaus).
Call it the Caudillo Test: http://t.co/EyouG5BBXb
Hillary Clinton for Caudillo … er, Caudilla? via @kausmickey http://t.co/GEFJAUKNcz
RT @GadsdenJazz: @kausmickey on Dem strategery & unconstitutional campaign promises http://t.co/sRqvq9bFfV @Coondawg68 @GretchenInOK http:…
Non-citizenship may be a “second-class status” but US citizens don’t owe anyone anything when they enter the country illegally. When a president takes unilateral action to bend the laws in favor of citizens of foreign countries it is US citizens who are disenfranchised and relegated to a second-class status.
@kausmickey Dear Mickey, for Democrat commitment to Democratic principles look no further than same-sex marriage. http://t.co/WLREB6nhiU