17
NYT: “suburban families, who voted for Mr. Rubio in droves.” How many droves could that be? He got 10% nyti.ms/20oBqoV
Mickey Kaus
Kausfiles
NYT: “suburban families, who voted for Mr. Rubio in droves.” How many droves could that be? He got 10% nyti.ms/20oBqoV
@kausmickey That’s a lot in a fragmented field. As it consolidates, he’ll garner more votes. Simple math. The votes’ll have to go somewhere.
@kausmickey Apparently large enclaves of Stepford wives in NH burbs felt obligated to vote for their kind. #Rubot
@kausmickey Rubio is second rate. Easy to see why the New York Times approves of him. https://t.co/7hQyIvaBTX
@kausmickey Only the older members, one hopes. This emo-manipulative “families” goo makes me sick.
@kausmickey I read that as a reference to Iowa, where Rubio concentrated on big suburban counties and overperformed…
@kausmickey I think they meant to say one suburban family drove the others TO the polls.
@kausmickey 1metric drove=1/10 of an electorate. So, 1 drove.
@Rumble_Trumble @kausmickey Rubio is near the end. His mistake and coverage near insurmountable.
@kausmickey the droves that don’t drive
@kausmickey As stated regarding RedState, folks are flocking to Rubio by “the tens”.