If Epstein had lived, wouldn’t Trump have eventually pardoned him?
— Mickey Kaus (@kausmickey)
Nov 17, 2025
from Twitter https://twitter.com/kausmickey
November 17, 2025 at 04:47PM
via IFTTT
If Epstein had lived, wouldn’t Trump have eventually pardoned him?
— Mickey Kaus (@kausmickey)
Nov 17, 2025
from Twitter https://twitter.com/kausmickey
November 17, 2025 at 04:47PM
via IFTTT
TODAY IN ANALOGIES!
Michael Wolff : Epstein :: Ben Smith : Michael Wolff
(former drawn to latter, despite obvious moral flaws; winds up writing implausible apologia)
— Mickey Kaus (@kausmickey)
Nov 17, 2025
from Twitter https://twitter.com/kausmickey
November 17, 2025 at 04:33PM
via IFTTT
Maybe this is obvious, but probably Epstein revered Lolita not just because he liked young girls but because he wanted someone (Wolff?) to depict him the way Nabokov depicts Humbert–ie recognizing his destructive immorality but sucking you in. Nabokov just left out the money
— Mickey Kaus (@kausmickey)
Nov 17, 2025
from Twitter https://twitter.com/kausmickey
November 17, 2025 at 04:21PM
via IFTTT
If it’s Podesta, Darryl Cooper is going to faint. (Cooper goes on and on about John Podesta’s brother’s sick art collection.)
— Mickey Kaus (@kausmickey)
Nov 17, 2025
from Twitter https://twitter.com/kausmickey
November 17, 2025 at 01:50AM
via IFTTT
Close, I tell you! Always sorta trust content from kausfiles. https://t.co/z6mBZyrbsF
— Mickey Kaus (@kausmickey)
Nov 17, 2025
from Twitter https://twitter.com/kausmickey
November 17, 2025 at 01:47AM
via IFTTT
A morning Breakfast at Jeffrey’s included Epstein, Ehud Barak and “a high ranking official from the Obama White House, whose name I am asked not to use,” Wolff writes in his unpublished 2014 profile. https://t.co/wgE9i1Cegb
Who dat? (It’s not Summers, who is mentioned by name
— Mickey Kaus (@kausmickey)
Nov 17, 2025
from Twitter https://twitter.com/kausmickey
November 17, 2025 at 01:29AM
via IFTTT
Maybe the journalistic payoff is in Wolff’s 2021 collection of essays about the rich and powerful, which discusses Epstein. Smith doesn’t cite anything revealing from it. https://t.co/q2PUWYjDWI The unpublished 2014 draft profile Smith just disclosed is embarrassing, not because https://t.co/lHoJ99ASU2
— Mickey Kaus (@kausmickey)
Nov 17, 2025
from Twitter https://twitter.com/kausmickey
November 17, 2025 at 01:15AM
via IFTTT
The unpublished profile is here https://t.co/wgE9i1Cegb
— Mickey Kaus (@kausmickey)
Nov 17, 2025
from Twitter https://twitter.com/kausmickey
November 16, 2025 at 11:39PM
via IFTTT
Note that in his defensive interview with Joanna Coles Wolff doesn’t say he would’ve gotten around to writing about Epstein’s sins. He says it was worth it to suck up to Epstein because Epstein became a “very significant source for me ” for his writing about Trump. [See https://t.co/yLVzWLgzc5
— Mickey Kaus (@kausmickey)
Nov 17, 2025
from Twitter https://twitter.com/kausmickey
November 16, 2025 at 11:38PM
via IFTTT
You’re only at the 3rd sentence of Wolff’s *unpublished* Epstein profile, when you hit this: “Once I arrived for a visit and found several police cars blocking the street and thought the worst-they’d come for him again.” Why was that ‘the worst’?
Sure, Wolff would’ve turned on https://t.co/yLVzWLgzc5
— Mickey Kaus (@kausmickey)
Nov 17, 2025
from Twitter https://twitter.com/kausmickey
November 16, 2025 at 11:24PM
via IFTTT
Releasing the Epstein files is what, a 70-30 or 80-20 issue in favor? Are all those people ‘they’re-all-pedos’ or TDS types? Is Massie? Doesn’t the overwhelming civic-minded opinion of a bipartisan majority have political force of its own in raising the issue? York seems to https://t.co/LblAhkE7ib
— Mickey Kaus (@kausmickey)
Nov 17, 2025
from Twitter https://twitter.com/kausmickey
November 16, 2025 at 11:13PM
via IFTTT
The backstory to this reversal, if it’s not fake, may be as revealing as the files. Why did Trump wait until his cover-up had ripped his party apart? Did he need to get permission from someone or some institution? What were his calculations? He could’ve done this months ago, no? https://t.co/v19MVFP4m7
— Mickey Kaus (@kausmickey)
Nov 17, 2025
from Twitter https://twitter.com/kausmickey
November 16, 2025 at 11:01PM
via IFTTT
Wolff just never got around to publishing about Epstein, you see, argues @semaforben. “There’s no reason to think, given his record, that he wouldn’t have burned Epstein once he’d filled his notebook.” But there are plenty of reasons. One is he’s had the time since Epstein died https://t.co/lHoJ99BqJA
— Mickey Kaus (@kausmickey)
Nov 17, 2025
from Twitter https://twitter.com/kausmickey
November 16, 2025 at 10:50PM
via IFTTT
“But it’s impossible to deny that in his coverage of Murdoch, of Trump’s circle, and of Epstein he captured scenes and voices that would otherwise have gone unrevealed.” Huh? Give him Murdoch and Trump? Where are the instructive scenes about Epstein? https://t.co/uNVRxPBaQD
— Mickey Kaus (@kausmickey)
Nov 17, 2025
from Twitter https://twitter.com/kausmickey
November 16, 2025 at 10:46PM
via IFTTT
#3 a good point *if* you think Epstein killed himself …. https://t.co/OJLLPGPbw7
— Mickey Kaus (@kausmickey)
Nov 16, 2025
from Twitter https://twitter.com/kausmickey
November 16, 2025 at 05:35PM
via IFTTT
There were & still are very good civic-minded reasons to release the Epstein files. It’s not just the “they’re-all-pedos” crowd. In part it’s a “were-powerful-officials-compromised-in-a sex-ring” crowd and also a “how-sick-is-our-ruling-elite” inquiry. https://t.co/LYUJrdNvET https://t.co/fYCu7FAJ5k
— Mickey Kaus (@kausmickey)
Nov 16, 2025
from Twitter https://twitter.com/kausmickey
November 16, 2025 at 03:39PM
via IFTTT
Internet encourages wild attention-getting overreactions. It’s not “the end of the Trump administration.” https://t.co/H36iFJZmFh To think I called @sullydish excitable.
— Mickey Kaus (@kausmickey)
Nov 16, 2025
from Twitter https://twitter.com/kausmickey
November 16, 2025 at 03:25PM
via IFTTT
Psst: Of course Trump ‘knew’ about the girls. He’s not a moron. Lots of people knew about the girls, certainly by the time of this 2007 article. https://t.co/RbVNRUbfm6 “He has never been secretive about the girls,” says, um, Michael Wolff in the article. Trump at least seems to
— Mickey Kaus (@kausmickey)
Nov 16, 2025
from Twitter https://twitter.com/kausmickey
November 16, 2025 at 03:25AM
via IFTTT
“It would be an understatement to note that Trump was living rent-free in Epstein’s head.” https://t.co/UDQZpztWhp
— Mickey Kaus (@kausmickey)
Nov 16, 2025
from Twitter https://twitter.com/kausmickey
November 16, 2025 at 02:37AM
via IFTTT
I dunno. BBC’s conduct would seem to violate at least one prong of the “actual malice” test–either BBC knew it was false (almost certainly) or they proceeded in “reckless disregard” of its truth or falsity. Much stronger on this key point than his suits against CNN, ABC or CBS. https://t.co/pboovkEq40
— Mickey Kaus (@kausmickey)
Nov 16, 2025
from Twitter https://twitter.com/kausmickey
November 16, 2025 at 01:32AM
via IFTTT
The California Endowment was created when the state somehow required the creation of a lavishly funded liberal non-profit as the price Blue Cross had to pay to go “for-profit.” An incestuous public-private Dem scam. As if the only non-profits are liberal non-profits (in this case https://t.co/Ar1Is0vSGw
— Mickey Kaus (@kausmickey)
Nov 16, 2025
from Twitter https://twitter.com/kausmickey
November 16, 2025 at 01:20AM
via IFTTT
Of course anything that actually *improves* a community (safer streets, OK schools, etc) potentially causes “gentrification.” So they have you coming and going. https://t.co/Ar1Is0vSGw
— Mickey Kaus (@kausmickey)
Nov 16, 2025
from Twitter https://twitter.com/kausmickey
November 16, 2025 at 01:06AM
via IFTTT
Three unforced errors hurting Trump:
1. Ballroom
2. Epstein files
3. H-1Bs— Mickey Kaus (@kausmickey)
Nov 16, 2025
from Twitter https://twitter.com/kausmickey
November 15, 2025 at 07:50PM
via IFTTT
… more like 99%, probably.
— Mickey Kaus (@kausmickey)
Nov 16, 2025
from Twitter https://twitter.com/kausmickey
November 15, 2025 at 07:47PM
via IFTTT
.@AnnCoulter podcast points:
1. Plenty of 14 year olds molested by JE
2. Trump & JE not buddies. Emails show Epstein obsessed with HATING Trump.
3. JE hated T so much, if he had dirt (eg photos) of Trump and girls he surely would’ve released them
4. Dirt JE thought he had was— Mickey Kaus (@kausmickey)
Nov 16, 2025
from Twitter https://twitter.com/kausmickey
November 15, 2025 at 07:19PM
via IFTTT