23

Maybe reason running on substance didn’t work 4 Rubio 1.0 wasn’t a flawed, trivializing media but voters rejecting his substance-ie Gangof8

| 11 years ago on Twitter

32

Hoping for a Gamergate question at one of these debates, just to send the campaign down a total black hole.

| 11 years ago on Twitter

31

Yes-in reputable poll a majority of Mexicans say “Mexicans have a right to be in the U.S.” Need wall to make a point twitter.com/isaacncohen/st…

| 11 years ago on Twitter

26

I assume ppl have already speculated this is just a cunning ploy to lower expectations (Team Rubio’s specialty) twitter.com/kausmickey/sta…

| 11 years ago on Twitter

50

SHOCK NUMBER, NO?: 61% agree “continued immigration into the country jeopardizes the United States” bloom.bg/21SyDdz

| 11 years ago on Twitter

30

Do we trust Marco Rubio with America’s nuclear codes? I worry he’ll push the button because @CesarConda tells him to!

| 11 years ago on Twitter

30

“when he ran against Obama, he didn’t talk that tough.” washex.am/1pa1vwT

| 11 years ago on Twitter

9

But it’s not beyond our ability to control a whole lot better than we’ve been controlling. Then we can argue levels twitter.com/Profepps/statu…

| 11 years ago on Twitter

39

“Rubio’s decision [to join Gangof8] made no political sense even at the time.” Knew MSM wld lionize him? slate.com/articles/news_… via @Slate

| 11 years ago on Twitter

9

Also Trump worried about a mercurial hair-trigger bully with his finger on the button (Qaddafi) slate.com/articles/news_…

| 11 years ago on Twitter

32

Those Rubio numbers in full: 11.1%, 16.4% 16.7%, 8%.

| 11 years ago on Twitter

67

CNN analysts (8 of ’em) trying to figure out what dragged down Rubio. Another mystery! (Pssst! Angofeightga)

| 11 years ago on Twitter