32

Where would Trump be without his initial immigration rant? 1% in polls? 2%? No matter how much vague “anger” there is. #Itsimmigrationstupid

| 11 years ago on Twitter

18

“Through it all [a] myopic drive on the part of leaders in both parties to enact a ‘comprehensive immigration reform’ freebeacon.com/columns/reveng…

| 11 years ago on Twitter

3

The graf beginning “These voters don’t give a whit about corporate tax reform” is great-even also a bit condescending freebeacon.com/columns/reveng…

| 11 years ago on Twitter

0

I want to be Joe McCarthy — you got to be Joe McCarthy last night.

24

Man, if this is the best they have against Walker (“scapegoating toothless trade unions”) he’s in great shape wpo.st/eE2S0

| 11 years ago on Twitter

20

Trump is about to leave the GOP’s 2016 strategy in shreds, and it may be the best thing that’s happened to them kausfiles.com/2015/07/23/pos…

| 11 years ago on Twitter

15

Wouldn’t it be even more Alpha if one of the top 10 candidates stood up to Fox & said “Let everyone into the debate” washex.am/1LAoMjP

| 11 years ago on Twitter

33

How is Trump “poisoning the GOP’s relationship” with white voters? Because other GOPs attack him & voters hate that? newrepublic.com/article/122350…

| 11 years ago on Twitter

30

If I were listing “cancers” on GOP I’d say 1) K St, 2) Bush family & attendant psycodrama. Trump wouldn’t make top 10 politico.com/story/2015/07/…

| 11 years ago on Twitter

11

Kristol’s argument is Trump brings new voters (not the usual social or tax-cut conservs) into GOP tent twitter.com/johnmarzan/sta…

| 11 years ago on Twitter

13

Kristol notes that GOP has been doing better in polls vs. Hillary, not worse, since Trump got in race twitter.com/johnmarzan/sta…

| 11 years ago on Twitter

44 Possibility #2: How Trump Could (Perversely) Save the GOP

Here’s another perverse possibility: a) Yes, Trump’s statements about Mexican immigrants are already so toxic they destroy whatever hope the GOP had of winning many more Latino votes in 2016; but b) that will force the eventual GOP nominee , probably not Trump, to pursue the alternative “Rust Belt” strategy — harvesting white working class votes — that actually has always been a better bet (since Latinos weren’t going to switch to the GOP next year anyway) but was resisted by the business- and donor-oriented GOP establishment because the latter favored more immigration and immigration amnesty. …

24 Possibility #1: How Jeb Can Hurt the GOP

Donors Choose — Badly! Huffington Post‘s poll of 500 GOP “activists” shows Jeb in miserable shape. He’s in sixth place, named as first or second choice by less than 15% of the activists. Some 47%  have an unfavorable opinion of him, and more then 1 in 4 say Bush (like Trump) is someone “they’d never vote for and that they’d be angry to see nominated.” So is it possible that a) Jeb can’t win but b) GOP donors have just given $100 million to a giant “independent” Death-Star-like SuperPAC that will inevitably spend much of it tearing down the Republican candidates (e.g. Walker, Rubio) who could win? Oops.

 

10

So if you came to US illegaly in the first 5 years AFTER Obama was first elected, Obama says you’re home free? natl.re/q5RKBm

| 11 years ago on Twitter

5

Psst–¿¡Jeb!? does miserably in poll of allegedly savvy GOP “activists.” Comes in 6th (counting second choices) huffingtonpost.com/entry/republic…

| 11 years ago on Twitter