30
Agree. But don’t think it’s 100% certain that Twitter “has no First Amendment obligations.” Cld be analogized 2 Pru… twitter.com/i/web/status/7…
Mickey Kaus
Kausfiles
Agree. But don’t think it’s 100% certain that Twitter “has no First Amendment obligations.” Cld be analogized 2 Pru… twitter.com/i/web/status/7…
@kausmickey “Free speech” is a societal ideal that we should try to uphold beyond the 1st Amendment protections related to government.
@kausmickey Funny how the Constitution evolves in SO MANY ways but never in defense of conservative public speech…
@kausmickey @davidfrum What I want: safe, non-hateful, interesting Twitter on at all hours of the day & night, filled w/ my Tweets
@kausmickey @davidfrum @TwitterIR cause $TWTR failed as defacto SMS common carrier, punished by market 4 censorship, gab.ai rising
@kausmickey Courts have been rejecting/limiting Pruneyard since it was decided. Hard to imagine it’ll suddenly be applied to the internet.
@kausmickey Wasn’t that a California case, not a US Supreme Court case? And one that’s been long criticized as aberrant?
@kausmickey Pruneyard was a Constitutional atrocity fortunately more cited in textbooks than legal opinions. @davidfrum
@kausmickey @davidfrum @TheAtlantic everyone has right to refuse service … except Christian bakers. They are uniquely evil.