"The Dirty Secret Behind the Jeff Sessions Mess: It may not be as sinister as it seems" https://t.co/KUV87PmSjB Always read @tafrank
— Mickey Kaus (@kausmickey) March 3, 2017
from Twitter https://twitter.com/kausmickey
"The Dirty Secret Behind the Jeff Sessions Mess: It may not be as sinister as it seems" https://t.co/KUV87PmSjB Always read @tafrank
— Mickey Kaus (@kausmickey) March 3, 2017
from Twitter https://twitter.com/kausmickey
Apparently you can't get away from the guy https://t.co/XDCiXkyhea
— Mickey Kaus (@kausmickey) March 2, 2017
from Twitter https://twitter.com/kausmickey
DON'T KNOW ABOUT YOU, BUT I WILL: "Voters won't forgive Republicans if they fail to repeal ObamaCare" https://t.co/r94nuUWmS6
— Mickey Kaus (@kausmickey) March 2, 2017
from Twitter https://twitter.com/kausmickey
A word in Trump's (very effective) speech seems to have set me off … Sorry! https://t.co/sRhlHoSD0g
— Mickey Kaus (@kausmickey) March 2, 2017
from Twitter https://twitter.com/kausmickey
"Non-citizenship" amnesty worst of 3 worlds 4 GOPS-1) Huge magnet for more illegals 2) Creates 2d class citizens 3) Gives Dems instant issue https://t.co/1WmTDKKiw1
— Mickey Kaus (@kausmickey) March 2, 2017
from Twitter https://twitter.com/kausmickey
A non-citizenship "path" was the cutting-edge strategy 2 sneak thru amnesty in 2013 https://t.co/AKgTcKrmeh Not new https://t.co/DFlJE5UFMu
— Mickey Kaus (@kausmickey) March 2, 2017
from Twitter https://twitter.com/kausmickey
One reason activists've long been willing 2 take less-than-citizenship is they know it won't last-they'll make it a cause & win citizenship. https://t.co/ECVFCLsRyE
— Mickey Kaus (@kausmickey) March 2, 2017
from Twitter https://twitter.com/kausmickey
Citizenship was never a dealbreaker 4 immigration activists. "Amnesty 1st" is the line-in-sand they have to give up https://t.co/yPbUJTRMG0 https://t.co/EWDQldJX6T
— Mickey Kaus (@kausmickey) March 2, 2017
from Twitter https://twitter.com/kausmickey
Total con. Immigration activists have long been willing to take legalization but not citizenship. https://t.co/DDlar2FlJY
— Mickey Kaus (@kausmickey) March 2, 2017
from Twitter https://twitter.com/kausmickey
Take that, Arianna! https://t.co/WvAfZbEw49
— Mickey Kaus (@kausmickey) March 2, 2017
from Twitter https://twitter.com/kausmickey
This thing would last 8 minutes in my neighborhood. https://t.co/UDYef39oCg
— Mickey Kaus (@kausmickey) March 2, 2017
from Twitter https://twitter.com/kausmickey
No "merit," please! We're American. https://t.co/sRhlHoSD0g
— Mickey Kaus (@kausmickey) March 2, 2017
from Twitter https://twitter.com/kausmickey
A small complaint about Tuesday’s speech: President Trump seems to think the most appealing way to frame his proposed immigration reform — shifting immigration from low-skilled to higher-skilled — is as “adopting a merit-based system.”
Why use that word? If I were going to crudely describe the roots of the Trump movement, it would be as a rebellion against the idea that people without degrees or high SAT scores or complicated training are the rational and inevitable losers in the global economy. Trade sends their jobs overseas, unskilled immigrants take their jobs at home, automation may permanently remove their jobs from the face of the Earth. That’s why you got Trump!
Calling this de-selection of the unskilled “meritocracy” only adds an invidious layer of judgment, as if the winners are superior to the losers — they have the smarts, or some other virtue (but usually smarts) and can justifiably look down their noses at unemployed ex-steelworkers in small Pennsylvania towns. That’s really why you got Trump. 2016 was a revolt for social equality.
It’s especially discordant for Trump to appeal to “merit,” in other words. Let’s call people with skills people with skills. They may have “merit,” they may not! In the case of immigrants, we don’t even know how they’ll perform in their new U.S. jobs — so even if you equate career success with “merit,” the judgment is premature. Yes, there’s an argument for preferring them over the unskilled . As Trump argues, they’ll pay more taxes and consume less in various benefit programs. More important, skilled immigrants will compete with — i.e. lower the wages — of well-trained Americans rather than unemployed ex-steelworkers. But they aren’t better, any more than liberal Hollywood movie stars are better than Chris Arnade’s photo subjects.
I remember making this argument against Reagan. Never worked. Works less now that a) less inflation fear b) more worry abt lack of stimulus https://t.co/SP2U08WpGA
— Mickey Kaus (@kausmickey) March 2, 2017
from Twitter https://twitter.com/kausmickey
— Mickey Kaus (@kausmickey) March 2, 2017
from Twitter https://twitter.com/kausmickey
But will state regulators give up drought-era reg scheme? Don't bet on it https://t.co/Ul5bATbmeG Almost like a law of bureaucracy at work.. https://t.co/hykdGF3Ike
— Mickey Kaus (@kausmickey) March 2, 2017
from Twitter https://twitter.com/kausmickey
Enjoyable discussion w/ @warrenolney1 as always. @SamPopkin had some suspect ideas about Trump's speech & immigration … https://t.co/WXjgh4A8YN
— Mickey Kaus (@kausmickey) March 1, 2017
from Twitter https://twitter.com/kausmickey
Makes some good anti-Trump points. On the other hand he had to secure his own oxygen mask before assisting others… https://t.co/rGvPZetm46
— Mickey Kaus (@kausmickey) March 1, 2017
from Twitter https://twitter.com/kausmickey