If you watch only one 18:54 minute segment of @bloggingheads episode, watch this one https://t.co/PZXcp1wDdb https://t.co/naquWACp2g
— Mickey Kaus (@kausmickey) November 20, 2019
from Twitter https://twitter.com/kausmickey
If you watch only one 18:54 minute segment of @bloggingheads episode, watch this one https://t.co/PZXcp1wDdb https://t.co/naquWACp2g
— Mickey Kaus (@kausmickey) November 20, 2019
from Twitter https://twitter.com/kausmickey
New @bloggingheads with @robertwrighter: https://t.co/Lfx6tSkU7J
— Mickey Kaus (@kausmickey) November 20, 2019
from Twitter https://twitter.com/kausmickey
"[T]urn over every stone" doesn't sound like something you'd tell someone who only cared about the announcement, not the investigation … https://t.co/HeonYTF6Zc
— Mickey Kaus (@kausmickey) November 20, 2019
from Twitter https://twitter.com/kausmickey
On the other hand, going through two official bureaucracies, one of them [Ukraine] famously corrupt, sounds like a recipe for nothing happening–i.e. no investigation. https://t.co/B1Zu3Sck5T
— Mickey Kaus (@kausmickey) November 20, 2019
from Twitter https://twitter.com/kausmickey
One puzzle: Does anyone think "Ukraine's investigating Biden!" would be such a devastating attack line in 2020 (compared with "Biden's son took hundreds of thousands of dollars from a corrupt gas company for … what?")? Do voters have so much respect for Ukraine's probity? https://t.co/tg5HdoQugx
— Mickey Kaus (@kausmickey) November 20, 2019
from Twitter https://twitter.com/kausmickey
They can bring the whole family onstage! https://t.co/NUWzCeF40I
— Mickey Kaus (@kausmickey) November 20, 2019
from Twitter https://twitter.com/kausmickey
I'll say that. Deal. Over. https://t.co/DfXPeJZxH2
— Mickey Kaus (@kausmickey) November 20, 2019
from Twitter https://twitter.com/kausmickey
HELLO! … DNA test shows Hunter Biden is father of Arkansas woman's baby https://t.co/blzeuEEU4z
— Mickey Kaus (@kausmickey) November 20, 2019
from Twitter https://twitter.com/kausmickey
.@AlanTonelson is back. Why was he suspended? Twitter says he violated rule against "using a trending or popular hashtag with an intent to subvert or manipulate a conversation …" a) Huh? b) BS c) Isn't that what hashtags are for? d) how does the algorithm know "intent" anyway?
— Mickey Kaus (@kausmickey) November 20, 2019
from Twitter https://twitter.com/kausmickey
It's not a process argument, they say. Nobody's making a process argument! And yet … it sure seems to be a process argument. MLATs–why didn't he use MLATs? https://t.co/frncqLUSAL
— Mickey Kaus (@kausmickey) November 20, 2019
from Twitter https://twitter.com/kausmickey
Really, if they can suspend Tonelson, they can suspend Mr. Rogers …. https://t.co/09EzU4McrX
— Mickey Kaus (@kausmickey) November 19, 2019
from Twitter https://twitter.com/kausmickey
TWITTER SUSPENDS TONELSON? The account of @AlanTonelson, about the mildest, most civil and fact-oriented tweeter around, has bizarrely been suspended. No reason given. Luckily Twitter can't block his calmly argued blog posts–like this one https://t.co/tAcasgjVPz
— Mickey Kaus (@kausmickey) November 19, 2019
from Twitter https://twitter.com/kausmickey
So I turn on my TV and here they are talking to Vindman about whether seeking a Burisma investigation was part of the "official policy of the U.S." or the product of the "policy formulation process"–as if U.S. policy wasn't what the president decides it is. https://t.co/vJjZqM5sIJ
— Mickey Kaus (@kausmickey) November 19, 2019
from Twitter https://twitter.com/kausmickey
If they don't tell you which party in the first 7 paragraphs, it's a Democrat … https://t.co/MVQ4Y94WQG
— Mickey Kaus (@kausmickey) November 19, 2019
from Twitter https://twitter.com/kausmickey
Free idea for @choire: Interview the people at @Ford who had to come up with an "authentic" fake sound to give their new electric Mustang. You're welcome.
— Mickey Kaus (@kausmickey) November 19, 2019
from Twitter https://twitter.com/kausmickey
I'd be deeply suspicious of anyone whose political beliefts I didn't know after working with them for years. Just saying! https://t.co/ENvN7h0XMP
— Mickey Kaus (@kausmickey) November 19, 2019
from Twitter https://twitter.com/kausmickey
See also Rob Long on the coming collisions at the Intersectionality intersection https://t.co/R74UDTBsKh https://t.co/MzF7Si21FF
— Mickey Kaus (@kausmickey) November 19, 2019
from Twitter https://twitter.com/kausmickey
That's a lot of witnesses … https://t.co/1Ozg797nrP
— Mickey Kaus (@kausmickey) November 19, 2019
from Twitter https://twitter.com/kausmickey
Also, if Trump's circumventing the normal official policy process is not the issue–almost irrelevant–we've sure spent a lot of time talking about it. https://t.co/DifKNeqJhq
— Mickey Kaus (@kausmickey) November 18, 2019
from Twitter https://twitter.com/kausmickey
McGeorge Bundy seems to have said the 9 people knew (the whole EXCOMM was a bit larger)–though it's not clear they knew how quid-pro-quo-y it would wind up being. Dobrynin said RFK said 4-5 people knew. All according to this > https://t.co/3tbklPIZBi
— Mickey Kaus (@kausmickey) November 18, 2019
from Twitter https://twitter.com/kausmickey
" …U.S. missiles from Turkey as a concession to Khrushchev. The episode remained secret from other members of the ExComm, including Vice President Lyndon Johnson, who had been urging the president to take a tougher line with Khrushchev." https://t.co/PAbunk0LQZ
— Mickey Kaus (@kausmickey) November 18, 2019
from Twitter https://twitter.com/kausmickey
Many sources do say the EXCOMM team knew about RFK's final Turkey concession. But he seems to have met with Dobrynin repeatedly outside the process before that. Then there's this from Foreign Policy: "Acting on JFK’s orders, Bobby Kennedy made a secret promise to withdraw… 1/2
— Mickey Kaus (@kausmickey) November 18, 2019
from Twitter https://twitter.com/kausmickey
Only 61 blocklists. Sad https://t.co/C5O0SPymqE
— Mickey Kaus (@kausmickey) November 18, 2019
from Twitter https://twitter.com/kausmickey
Thanks. That's the source cited by Wikipedia. https://t.co/lunjSoFWJT
— Mickey Kaus (@kausmickey) November 18, 2019
from Twitter https://twitter.com/kausmickey
"Why did some government employees think…Trump's July 25 call to…Zelensky represented a lost opportunity, or poor judgment, while others thought it represented wrongdoing requiring congressional investigation? Democrats do not want the public to know." https://t.co/6brfuXN8Iy
— Mickey Kaus (@kausmickey) November 18, 2019
from Twitter https://twitter.com/kausmickey