Maybe Sen. Bolduc will be loyal to Sen. Schumer, his funder. Money talks! https://t.co/Ag9niIyWII
— Mickey Kaus (@kausmickey)
Nov 3, 2022
from Twitter https://twitter.com/kausmickey
November 03, 2022 at 05:19PM
via IFTTT
Maybe Sen. Bolduc will be loyal to Sen. Schumer, his funder. Money talks! https://t.co/Ag9niIyWII
— Mickey Kaus (@kausmickey)
Nov 3, 2022
from Twitter https://twitter.com/kausmickey
November 03, 2022 at 05:19PM
via IFTTT
Immigration as important as crime (and crime is killing the Dems) https://t.co/COLV3iYaeb
— Mickey Kaus (@kausmickey)
Nov 3, 2022
from Twitter https://twitter.com/kausmickey
November 03, 2022 at 01:59PM
via IFTTT
I’m glad Woke Medicine –eg vax distribution by race on “social justice” grounds–is finally getting the electoral blowback it deserves. Woke Medicine poses a huge threat to popular support for Medicare and more universal national health care plans https://t.co/rkJIsgR9zG
— Mickey Kaus (@kausmickey)
Nov 3, 2022
from Twitter https://twitter.com/kausmickey
November 03, 2022 at 11:35AM
via IFTTT
Kind of a Trifecta … https://t.co/fJFpXwxkDq
— Mickey Kaus (@kausmickey)
Nov 2, 2022
from Twitter https://twitter.com/kausmickey
November 02, 2022 at 02:47PM
via IFTTT
Sources say he will hit Jim Crow 2.0 hard! … https://t.co/ZotGn49o1W
— Mickey Kaus (@kausmickey)
Nov 2, 2022
from Twitter https://twitter.com/kausmickey
November 02, 2022 at 02:40PM
via IFTTT
Clip is from 2019 and he only seemed to an average listener to be saying he actually *attended* DSU. So it’s not as bad as his 1987 “higher IQ” fusillade of BS. … https://t.co/KiHGNkI2WU
— Mickey Kaus (@kausmickey)
Nov 2, 2022
from Twitter https://twitter.com/kausmickey
November 02, 2022 at 12:38AM
via IFTTT
Oy. He still has a “much higher IQ.’ https://t.co/5ej2EycHIa https://t.co/pLBUNnPoTv
— Mickey Kaus (@kausmickey)
Nov 2, 2022
from Twitter https://twitter.com/kausmickey
November 01, 2022 at 11:18PM
via IFTTT
?????? https://t.co/r5yqVH7lev
— Mickey Kaus (@kausmickey)
Nov 2, 2022
from Twitter https://twitter.com/kausmickey
November 01, 2022 at 10:41PM
via IFTTT
Wild story https://t.co/dltvQJ1jt6
— Mickey Kaus (@kausmickey)
Nov 1, 2022
from Twitter https://twitter.com/kausmickey
November 01, 2022 at 09:23AM
via IFTTT
U.K. …. https://t.co/n9KxMqQvEI
— Mickey Kaus (@kausmickey)
Nov 1, 2022
from Twitter https://twitter.com/kausmickey
October 31, 2022 at 10:26PM
via IFTTT
Would give everyone a bit of sure footing and reassurance (eg. no N-words).. Some people–esp. the wokest–would be unsatisfied; Might not be profit-maximizing (if people and advertisers demand exceptionally safe spaces). But does Musk have to maximize profits?
— Mickey Kaus (@kausmickey)
Oct 31, 2022
from Twitter https://twitter.com/kausmickey
October 31, 2022 at 06:16PM
via IFTTT
P.S.: What if Musk published a non-vague list of limits in each of the key categories:1) These are the fighting words you can’t use–like the FCC’s famous 7 dirty words; 2) This is the high bar for “provably false” and how we’ll implement it; 3) just drop the “hate speech” ban.??
— Mickey Kaus (@kausmickey)
Oct 31, 2022
from Twitter https://twitter.com/kausmickey
October 31, 2022 at 06:13PM
via IFTTT
But if he doesn’t have answers to all the issues, at least he identifies them — “cabins” the problems, to use one of lawyer’s fave words. And putting it all under the current First Amendment should serve to frustrate the censors’ most misguided impulses. 5/5
— Mickey Kaus (@kausmickey)
Oct 31, 2022
from Twitter https://twitter.com/kausmickey
October 31, 2022 at 05:53PM
via IFTTT
Third, he practically invites SCOTUS to create a new “hate speech” exception to the 1st Amendment (“define a segment of hate speech not currently covered under the existing First Amendment exceptions and declare it unprotected.”) Seems capable of swallowing free speech whole. 4/
— Mickey Kaus (@kausmickey)
Oct 31, 2022
from Twitter https://twitter.com/kausmickey
October 31, 2022 at 05:50PM
via IFTTT
Second, he’d let sites ban “provably false” info as unprotected. The issue as he recognizes is who decides what’s “provably false.” He doesn’t have a satisfying answer. It can’t be just Twitter’s opinion or Twitter’s research. It shouldn’t be based on whether MSM approves. 3/
— Mickey Kaus (@kausmickey)
Oct 31, 2022
from Twitter https://twitter.com/kausmickey
October 31, 2022 at 05:46PM
via IFTTT
First, Sacks would expand unprotected “fighting words” to include “all racist, misogynist, homophobic, and other slurs.” Seems OK, but what trans activists consider a fighting-word slur the @BabylonBee considers is political satire. This category would have to be limited, no? 2/
— Mickey Kaus (@kausmickey)
Oct 31, 2022
from Twitter https://twitter.com/kausmickey
October 31, 2022 at 05:39PM
via IFTTT
This by @DavidSacks seems like the beginning of progress on the content moderation problem. Would only ban speech unprotected by the 1st Amendment, but there’s some trickiness … 1/ https://t.co/oAlc29saAl
— Mickey Kaus (@kausmickey)
Oct 31, 2022
from Twitter https://twitter.com/kausmickey
October 31, 2022 at 05:36PM
via IFTTT
Yes. Now do the fully refundable child tax credit Dems have been pushing … no work required. https://t.co/zUoBWvYlNo
— Mickey Kaus (@kausmickey)
Oct 31, 2022
from Twitter https://twitter.com/kausmickey
October 31, 2022 at 03:05PM
via IFTTT
The thing about Musk is if he makes a bad move and gets blowback he is likely to change course very quickly, no? Not likely to go down in flames. https://t.co/WSXh80AbXG
— Mickey Kaus (@kausmickey)
Oct 31, 2022
from Twitter https://twitter.com/kausmickey
October 30, 2022 at 11:11PM
via IFTTT
No fan of Bolsonaro, but is a 50.9% to 49.1% win a “rebuke”? https://t.co/w8errOJKL9
— Mickey Kaus (@kausmickey)
Oct 31, 2022
from Twitter https://twitter.com/kausmickey
October 30, 2022 at 08:51PM
via IFTTT
Also: Have the abortion allegations against Herschel Walker reached their Swetnick Moment? https://t.co/ygipxepjOt
— Mickey Kaus (@kausmickey)
Oct 31, 2022
from Twitter https://twitter.com/kausmickey
October 30, 2022 at 08:12PM
via IFTTT
How Clintonesque could he be if he passes up an easy triangulation like this? https://t.co/mKPLmQH9B5
— Mickey Kaus (@kausmickey)
Oct 30, 2022
from Twitter https://twitter.com/kausmickey
October 30, 2022 at 07:02PM
via IFTTT
How can that be? The “restrictions have only a modest impact on immigrant household use rates primarily because non-citizens (including illegal immigrants) can receive benefits on behalf of their U.S.-born children who are awarded …full welfare eligibility at birth.”
— Mickey Kaus (@kausmickey)
Oct 30, 2022
from Twitter https://twitter.com/kausmickey
October 30, 2022 at 06:53PM
via IFTTT
,@NPRJoel says it’s incorrect & “misleading or false” to say “immigrants are more likely to use public benefits than the native-born population.”
Again, it is apparently not false (even though new immigrants and illegals are barred from some programs), https://t.co/eKcuc210lk https://t.co/pAIhlFnSYi
— Mickey Kaus (@kausmickey)
Oct 30, 2022
from Twitter https://twitter.com/kausmickey
October 30, 2022 at 06:51PM
via IFTTT
So … fighting speech with speech works. https://t.co/WJLaU75ADT
— Mickey Kaus (@kausmickey)
Oct 30, 2022
from Twitter https://twitter.com/kausmickey
October 30, 2022 at 06:26PM
via IFTTT