31 Jack Kemp stood for “intellectual humility?” nyti.ms/1k0W14J Share this:Click to share on Twitter (Opens in new window)Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)Click to share on Google+ (Opens in new window) Related
@kausmickey Let him speak
@kausmickey from David Brooks because obviously….
@kausmickey If Jack Kemp didn’t stand for intellectual humility, he should have. He didn’t have the talent to be entitled to any hubris.
@kausmickey Likewise, Reid, Kennedy, Frank, and Waxman avoided bombastic and hyperbolic prose styles. Soothing best described them.
@kausmickey well he had much to be humble about at least
@kausmickey His pant creases were humble as well.
@kausmickey Is “intellectual humility” more important or challenging than the old-fashioned, regular humility?
@kausmickey I liked Jack Kemp but the attempt to act like he was some consequential figure in American history is laughable
@kausmickey @AnnCoulter sounds like the lobbyists telling US conservatives to stop rocking the boat, stop changing their comfortable world.
@kausmickey @AnnCoulter Jack Kemp was a great congressman he had a few slide issues but
@kausmickey @AnnCoulter And @nytimes wonders why no one is reading them anymore?
.@kausmickey @AnnCoulter This crap from someone who voted for Obama twice…and has no remorse.
@kausmickey @AnnCoulter Does anybody take NYT seriously anymore?