Yes, but the Smith/Wyden bill has found a grey ares, no?: Two years of benefits for one year of work. Why not 20 years of benefits? At some point work connection becomes tenuous. Why not keep a ‘lookback’, but say one year of income can only support one year of benefits? https://t.co/NJA33K2NuI

— Mickey Kaus (@kausmickey)
Jan 26, 2024

from Twitter https://twitter.com/kausmickey

January 26, 2024 at 11:40AM
via IFTTT