Mickey Kaus

Kausfiles

Skip to content
  • Home
  • About
Mickey Kaus

10

Nicole Wallace defending Trump against hack MSNBC charge that he’s only negative. Didn’t expect that.

Share this:

  • Click to share on Twitter (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Google+ (Opens in new window)

Related

| 5 years ago on Twitter

Post navigation

← Feature not bug https://t.co/siqjLbthHH Maybe Zuckerberg has some new vote-counting softwa… →
Logging In...

Profile cancel

Sign in with Twitter Sign in with Facebook
or

Not published

  • 10 Replies
  • 1 Comment
  • 9 Tweets
  • 0 Facebook
  • 0 Pingbacks
Last reply was February 1, 2016
TheRalphRetort retweeted thisHomsher_PhD retweeted thisElenihowhow1 retweeted thisSmallgGay retweeted thishourilo retweeted thisFieldRoamer retweeted this
  1. @TEDX_Cruz
    View February 1, 2016

    @kausmickey she will turn tricks for a job in a Trump administration just like the rest of the establishment cockroaches.

  2. @FCodeley
    View February 1, 2016

    @kausmickey He’s NOT all negative, he just wants to make America a little whiter. https://t.co/cXzTsugXmk

  3. @Rose_Marie_Holt
    View February 1, 2016

    @kausmickey I keep thinking of her as a mass murderer. #LawandOrderCriminalIntent

  4. KSantal
    View February 1, 2016

    She’s a political professional and understands there are 2 machines in Iowa, Evangies and establishment. They pay people to organize and probably pay most of the voters. Jeb was so low in the poll they just couldn’t do it for him. Trump already said Vanderplats wanted $100K from him. For example, Cruz got 45,000 votes @ $100 head to come out, its only $4,500,000. Chickenfeed to Cruz Super Packers. Same with establishment candidate. The TV ads are like the magician’s assistant in the fishnet stockings.

    Trump getting 24% vs the Evangie establishment candidate’s 28% (Cruz wouldn’t get 10% without the evangie establishment) says that Trump DID get the new voters.

    It has to be the way it is, just logical. Why would Huck and Santo get only 2 and 1%? They were past winners, spent lots of time there, have the evangie credentials. They made no relationships with voters? If they’d gotten 5%, OK, maybe you’d think the evangie voters wanted a new person. Doing so poorly tells me the evangie voters weren’t going to get anything voting for Huck or Santo.

Pages

  • About

Categories

  • Blog Items
  • digital marketing
  • PPC
  • SEO
  • Twitter
  • Uncategorized

Links

  • RSS Feed

Archives

  • January 2021
  • December 2020
  • September 2020
  • August 2020
  • July 2020
  • June 2020
  • May 2020
  • April 2020
  • March 2020
  • February 2020
  • January 2020
  • December 2019
  • November 2019
  • October 2019
  • September 2019
  • August 2019
  • July 2019
  • June 2019
  • May 2019
  • April 2019
  • March 2019
  • February 2019
  • January 2019
  • December 2018
  • November 2018
  • October 2018
  • September 2018
  • August 2018
  • July 2018
  • June 2018
  • May 2018
  • April 2018
  • March 2018
  • February 2018
  • January 2018
  • December 2017
  • November 2017
  • October 2017
  • September 2017
  • August 2017
  • July 2017
  • June 2017
  • May 2017
  • April 2017
  • March 2017
  • February 2017
  • January 2017
  • December 2016
  • November 2016
  • October 2016
  • September 2016
  • August 2016
  • July 2016
  • June 2016
  • May 2016
  • April 2016
  • March 2016
  • February 2016
  • January 2016
  • December 2015
  • November 2015
  • October 2015
  • September 2015
  • August 2015
  • July 2015
  • June 2015
  • May 2015
  • April 2015
  • March 2015
  • February 2015
  • April 2010
  • March 2010

Copyright © 2010 - 2021.

Proudly powered by WordPress and hosted by PressHarbor Managed Hosting.